IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
C.W.P. No.105 of 2013 (O&M)
Date of Decision:17.01.2013
Devender Kumar and others
.....Petitioners
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Present:- Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners.
****
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.(Oral)
C.M. No.705 of 2013
Application is allowed as prayed for. Annexures P.7 and P.8 are
taken on record.
C.M stands disposed of.
C.W.P. No.105 of 2013
Petitioners, in response to Advertisement No. 2/2009,
applied for the posts of Lecturers in English and Political Science.
They stand selected but the appointment letters were not issued to
the petitioners on the ground that the matter with regard to the
degrees obtained by the petitioners through correspondence is
pending consideration in CWP No. 1640 of 2008 titled as Kartar
Singh vs. Union of India and others, decided on 06.11.2012
(Annexure P-5). It is contended that the said judgment does not
relate to the academic course and the same deals with technical
course, which degrees have been obtained through correspondence
C.W.P. No.105 of 2013 (O&M) -2-
and the same has been found to be not in consonance with the
Statute. As the petitioners had obtained academic degrees through
correspondence, the said judgment could not be applicable to the
case of the petitioners. After the decision of the Division Bench of this
Court, petitioners had submitted a representation dated 22.11.2012
(Annexure P-6) to the Director, Secondary Education, Haryanarespondent
No. 2 but till date, no decision thereon has been taken
nor appointment letters issued to the petitioners.
Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners,
at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the Director,
Secondary Education, Haryana-respondent No. 2 to consider and
decide the representation dated 22.11.2012 (Annexure P-6) within
some specified time.
Without going into the merits of the case or commenting
thereon, the present petition is disposed of with directions to the
Director, Secondary Education, Haryana-respondent No. 2 to
consider and decide the representation dated 22.11.2012 (Annexure
P-6) within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order. The decision so taken be conveyed to the
petitioner forthwith.
January 17, 2013 ( TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA )
renu JUDGE
AT CHANDIGARH
****
C.W.P. No.105 of 2013 (O&M)
Date of Decision:17.01.2013
Devender Kumar and others
.....Petitioners
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Present:- Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners.
****
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.(Oral)
C.M. No.705 of 2013
Application is allowed as prayed for. Annexures P.7 and P.8 are
taken on record.
C.M stands disposed of.
C.W.P. No.105 of 2013
Petitioners, in response to Advertisement No. 2/2009,
applied for the posts of Lecturers in English and Political Science.
They stand selected but the appointment letters were not issued to
the petitioners on the ground that the matter with regard to the
degrees obtained by the petitioners through correspondence is
pending consideration in CWP No. 1640 of 2008 titled as Kartar
Singh vs. Union of India and others, decided on 06.11.2012
(Annexure P-5). It is contended that the said judgment does not
relate to the academic course and the same deals with technical
course, which degrees have been obtained through correspondence
C.W.P. No.105 of 2013 (O&M) -2-
and the same has been found to be not in consonance with the
Statute. As the petitioners had obtained academic degrees through
correspondence, the said judgment could not be applicable to the
case of the petitioners. After the decision of the Division Bench of this
Court, petitioners had submitted a representation dated 22.11.2012
(Annexure P-6) to the Director, Secondary Education, Haryanarespondent
No. 2 but till date, no decision thereon has been taken
nor appointment letters issued to the petitioners.
Counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners,
at this stage, would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the Director,
Secondary Education, Haryana-respondent No. 2 to consider and
decide the representation dated 22.11.2012 (Annexure P-6) within
some specified time.
Without going into the merits of the case or commenting
thereon, the present petition is disposed of with directions to the
Director, Secondary Education, Haryana-respondent No. 2 to
consider and decide the representation dated 22.11.2012 (Annexure
P-6) within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order. The decision so taken be conveyed to the
petitioner forthwith.
January 17, 2013 ( TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA )
renu JUDGE
No comments:
Post a Comment